张英媛,王国栋,陆阿明.下肢优势侧评定方法的比较研究[J].北京体育大学学报,2014,37(10):83-88.
下肢优势侧评定方法的比较研究
A Comparative Study of Assessment Methods of Determining Dominant Lower Limb
投稿时间:2013-07-11  
DOI:
中文关键词:  关键词:评定方法  下肢  优势侧  力量评定  单腿前跳  10 m连跳
英文关键词:Key words: assessment methods  lower limbs  dominant side  strength assessment  single-leg forward jump  10m jumps
基金项目:江苏省体育局体育科技局管课题(ST13101204);江苏省高校自然科学基金项目(13KJB310020)。通信作者:陆阿明。
作者单位
张英媛 河北科技师范学院河北 秦皇岛 066004苏州大学江苏 苏州 215021 
王国栋 苏州大学江苏 苏州 215021 
陆阿明 苏州大学江苏 苏州 215021 
摘要点击次数: 2668
全文下载次数: 167
中文摘要:
      摘要:目的:探索在5种评定方法下下肢优势侧和非优势侧的侧别差异。方法:采用26名健康男性作为受试者,每名受试者进行5种评定方法下下肢优势侧和非优势侧的评定,对5种评定方法下下肢优势侧和非优势侧的相关指标进行分析,利用相关分析对所采集的下肢优势侧和非优势侧数据进行分析。结果:5种评定方法在进行下肢优势侧和非优势侧评定时均具有有效性,其中单腿前跳对称指数和单腿纵跳对称指数在评定下肢优势侧和非优势侧时呈显著性正相关,向心/向心180°/s时膝关节屈肌力量对称指数和伸肌力量对称指数呈显著性负相关,单腿纵跳对称指数和向心/向心180°/s时膝关节屈肌力量对称指数呈显著性负相关,其余两两指标之间均未表现出相关性。结论:在进行下肢优势侧和非优势侧划分时,使用不同的评定方法会产生不同的划分结果,因此在进行下肢优势侧与非优势侧对运动影响方面的研究时要合理的选择评定方法。
英文摘要:
      Abstract: Purpose: This paper aims to explore the difference among five assessment methods of determining dominant side of lower limbs. Methods: Twenty-six healthy adults were recruited and were determined their dominant leg by using five assessment methods. All the related indicators were analyzed and the differences between the dominant side and non-dominant side were detected. Results: These five assessment methods are effective to determine dominant leg and non-dominant leg. The symmetric index of single-leg forward jump is highly related to that of single-leg vertical jump. The symmetric index of knee joint’s flexor strength at 180°/s is negatively related to that of extensor strength. The symmetric index of single-leg vertical jump is negatively related to that of knee joint’s flexor strength at 180°/s. No relationship is existed between other indexes. Conclusion: Different assessment methods have different results to determine dominant side of lower limbs. We should choose the proper method when we detect the effect of dominant side and non-dominant side on exercise.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器