蒋德龙.安德鲁斯三角形之争与体育学派的形成——PE派与SPORT派[J].北京体育大学学报,2012,35(12):22-28.
安德鲁斯三角形之争与体育学派的形成——PE派与SPORT派
Andrews Triangle Debate and the Formation of the Sports School——PE School and SPORT School
投稿时间:2011-06-22  
DOI:
中文关键词:  关键词:安德鲁斯三角形  体育学派  PE派  SPORT派  学术自由  学术自觉  学术翻译
英文关键词:Key words: Andrews Triangle  sports school  PE school  SPORT school, academic freedom, academic consciousness, academic interpretation
基金项目:基金项目:湖南省哲学社会科学基金项目(项目编号:12YBB033)。
作者单位
蒋德龙 衡阳师范学院体育系湖南 衡阳 421008 
摘要点击次数: 3273
全文下载次数: 290
中文摘要:
      摘要:运用学术史方法,对关于安德鲁斯三角形之争资料进行了归纳、分析和解读,力图还原体育学术史实,而有益于体育学术发展脉络的厘清,结论认为:安德鲁斯三角形不是安德鲁斯原创,是来自罗依.格罗夫斯发表的论文,说明体育(PE)、身体娱乐(PR)和高级竞技(ES)之间的关系在一国中的不同情形;安德鲁斯三角形之争,在我国历经三个阶段,伴有两个学术派别生成———PE派与SPORT派;两个学派的争论在代表人物、重要观点、方法论、学术信念、学术兴趣、学术印记上有比较明显的区分,在学术自由、学术自觉、学术翻译等方面有重要的启示。
英文摘要:
      Abstract:Using the method of academic history, the paper reviews, analyzes and interprets the Andrews triangle controversy. It seeks to restore sports academic history so as to help clarify the context of sports academic development. It concludes that the Andrews triangle is not originated by Andrews, but from the thesis of Luo. Groves that explains the state of relationship among physical education (PE), physical recreation (PR) and senior athletics (ES) in a country. The Andrews triangle controversy have gone through three stages, and two academic groups are generated, namely, PE school and SPORT school, in China. There was a obvious distinction between representative figures, important ideas, methodology, belief, academic interests and academic interpretation. And it has important implications on academic freedom, academic consciousness and translations.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器